Monday, July 16, 2007

2004 Feb essay memo

Q1 Criminal Pro ( informant called police about a guy who might commit robbery, police found the marked bills and shortgun)

  • 4th amd: serizure
  • arrest? ( police's gun pointing down/ defedent handcuffed) warran generally not required
  • other detain? stop and frisk
  • 4th amd: search
  • state action
  • privacy
  • no warrant
  • warrantless search
    • search incident to lawful arrest
    • plan view ( I dount this one, but 2 model answers mentioned plan view)
    • 5th amd: Miranda Warning
    • custodial: not free to leave
    • interrogation: questions might invoke answer
    • physical action: testimonial? ( Defendent looked a garbage can around and police found the shortgun inside)
    • shall the evidence found from the violation of Miranda Warning be excluded?
    • Taking Defendent voice without crossexam and witness
    Q2 Community Property ( outstate HW moved to CA, then husband moved to live with mistress)

    • prior marriage debt
    • Q-CP: divorce
    • when did the CP end?
    • putative spouse
    • mistress's personal account
    • what can the creditor reach into?
    Q3 Professional Responsibility ( former client brought her father to lawyer and asked lawyer to draft a will/deed for her father)

    • Who is the client?
    • Duty of loyalty: IC between former clients and current clients
    • Duty of confidentiality
    • Competency: skill, knowledge, thoroughtness, preparation
    • receiving payment from 3rd person
    • fee: PRC:reasonable, CA: unconscionable
    • Duty of Fairness to 3rd Party
    Q4 Real Property ( cards store in the shopping mall, familiar right?)

    • covenants: intent/touch&concern
    • assigment: privity in land
    • interaction between covenat violations:
    • if landlord violates covenats, can tenant stop to pay rent? ( independency of covenants?)
    • waiver
    • can Landloard sue assignor for rent?
    Q5 Con Law ( association filed suit for its members for a state law which restricted broader than the federal law):

    • orginization standing: members harm/harm related to purpose/ ind participation unncessary
    • supreme clause: Fed preemption
    • commerce clause
    • negative application of commerce clause
    Q6 Civil Pro (court dismissed D's 12 b motions)

    • PJ: general long arm statute My Parents Foreseeably Forgot Read Child Story.
    • SMJ: FQ & diviersity
    • Complusory Joinder: can't enter a complete judgement/ defendent can't defense itself
    • indispensible 3rd party: what shall the court do if an indispensible party will destroy diversity?
    • Conterclaim: D->P if from same T/O, lost the claim if D didnot counterclaim
    • supplemental jusrisrication
      • FQ: same nexus of facts
      • diversity of J: same T/O ( for PP to DD, can overcome amount but not diversity)

    No comments: