skip to main |
skip to sidebar
2004 Feb essay memo
Q1 Criminal Pro ( informant called police about a guy who might commit robbery, police found the marked bills and shortgun)- 4th amd: serizure
- arrest? ( police's gun pointing down/ defedent handcuffed) warran generally not required
- other detain? stop and frisk
state actionprivacyno warrantwarrantless search- search incident to lawful arrest
- plan view ( I dount this one, but 2 model answers mentioned plan view)
- 5th amd: Miranda Warning
- custodial: not free to leave
- interrogation: questions might invoke answer
- physical action: testimonial? ( Defendent looked a garbage can around and police found the shortgun inside)
- shall the evidence found from the violation of Miranda Warning be excluded?
- Taking Defendent voice without crossexam and witness
Q2 Community Property ( outstate HW moved to CA, then husband moved to live with mistress)- prior marriage debt
- Q-CP: divorce
- when did the CP end?
- putative spouse
- mistress's personal account
- what can the creditor reach into?
Q3 Professional Responsibility ( former client brought her father to lawyer and asked lawyer to draft a will/deed for her father)- Who is the client?
- Duty of loyalty: IC between former clients and current clients
- Duty of confidentiality
- Competency: skill, knowledge, thoroughtness, preparation
- receiving payment from 3rd person
- fee: PRC:reasonable, CA: unconscionable
- Duty of Fairness to 3rd Party
Q4 Real Property ( cards store in the shopping mall, familiar right?)- covenants: intent/touch&concern
- assigment: privity in land
- interaction between covenat violations:
- if landlord violates covenats, can tenant stop to pay rent? ( independency of covenants?)
- waiver
- can Landloard sue assignor for rent?
Q5 Con Law ( association filed suit for its members for a state law which restricted broader than the federal law):- orginization standing: members harm/harm related to purpose/ ind participation unncessary
- supreme clause: Fed preemption
- commerce clause
- negative application of commerce clause
Q6 Civil Pro (court dismissed D's 12 b motions)- PJ: general long arm statute My Parents Foreseeably Forgot Read Child Story.
- SMJ: FQ & diviersity
- Complusory Joinder: can't enter a complete judgement/ defendent can't defense itself
- indispensible 3rd party: what shall the court do if an indispensible party will destroy diversity?
- Conterclaim: D->P if from same T/O, lost the claim if D didnot counterclaim
- supplemental jusrisrication
- FQ: same nexus of facts
- diversity of J: same T/O ( for PP to DD, can overcome amount but not diversity)
No comments:
Post a Comment